Photo by rawpixel.com from Pexels

Probably lost of questions are in your mind regarding self-organizing teams, like: How do you build them? Is any type of organization able to build them? How long does it take to turn the whole organization to an agile self-organizing setting?

Companies can scale up agile to create substantial benefits, though it is important to discuss some considerations before implementing agile teams:

  • Any organization can become self-organized, but there are some teams that will have it easier than others, depending on the type of task they perform, the prevailing culture and the leaders that guide the effort.
  • Not every function needs to be organized as self-organizing teams; though a “we culture” approach company-wide is desired to ease the work across groups. That means even though the structure of some of the functions may not change, every employee should start getting the “We culture” habits in terms of systems and teamwork, caring for internal and external clients, embracing empowerment and self-discipline.

Subscribe to our Newsletter!

Biztorming new weekly newsletter, featuring must-read content for an agile leader.
Get the Newsletter in your inbox ⇒

  • Teams are usually small. Amazon has the “two-pizza team”, meaning that the team should be small enough to be fed by two pizzas, which would be six to 10 people. Google usually prefers three to six people.
  • Routine operations such as purchasing and accounting are less fertile ground for the self-organizing teams, as they are used to work in silos. But still can be achieved and provide lots of benefits to increase flow, efficiency and even increase employee engagement. Zappos has applied the system company-wide, and it’s even transferring the learning to its parent company Amazon. In Operations that are complex and require continuous change, like IT have been successfully implemented, like Netflix, Spotify, Ideo, Apple. On my side, I have applied this culture in companies in industrial settings, retail, and non-profits. Hospitals and schools could also benefit.
  • Agile and self-organizing teams support the ones that are not self-organized too. So, once you begin launching these teams, you can’t just leave the other parts of the business alone. Some changes may be needed, or again, at least, people should be trained on the new habits to be able to understand and serve the other groups.
  • Leaders need to be aligned and in agreement with the new setting, as they are the example that everybody will follow. I usually find that the main constraints are middle leaders training and budget. Middle leaders are pivotal in this change, so they need special attention. Usually, they are evaluated on how well they control, but in a self-organizing team, command and control are to be avoided. For them at the very beginning is a big mindset change that needs to be acknowledged and addressed.
  • Budget and procurement areas are a constraint because usually, they generate delays in decision making. That’s why most of these type of teams choose to manage their own budget. 
  • The team needs to have clear boundaries to help unleash their power without disturbing the rest of the company. Teams can be formed based on specific projects or based on physical boundaries. In manufacturing settings, for example, we draw a map of the areas and divide each area into “lots” that each employee own. They can decide what to do with it. They can define the rules for every little thing that belongs to that specific lot; machines, floors, processes, tools.  That will help the employees “visualize their ownership” and get used to it. The truth is that people are not used to making decisions or owning parts of a plant, so you have to make it easy for them to understand.

How to choose where to start?

The cultural transformation can start in a pilot group, or with all teams at once. I firmly recommend starting with a pilot self-organizing team. Providing general training to everyone else and follow-up with monthly audits can complement a specific training to the pilot section. Once the first team has started and there are some learnings on what worked and what did not work, then you can continue with the next teams in waves.

RECOMMENDED COURSES: Agile Leadership

As per Harvard Business Review “To get started on this test-and-learn cycle, leadership teams typically employ two essential tools: a taxonomy of potential teams and a sequencing plan reflecting the company’s key priorities. Taxonomy in hand, the leadership team sets priorities and sequences initiatives. Leaders must consider multiple criteria, including strategic importance, budget limitations, availability of people, return on investment, cost of delays, risk levels, and interdependencies among teams.” The pain points felt by customers and employees should be considered among the main priorities.

Lu Paulise

Lu Paulise Luciana Paulise

luciana@biztorming.com

@lupaulise

Biztorming Training & Consulting

A little more eager to jump into The We Culture? Schedule a free call  to discuss the adoption process for your unique situation.


6 Comments

5 essential habits for agile time management - Biztorming · 1 May, 2019 at 1:23 pm

[…] management” refers to the way that you organize your tasks. Your “system” to prioritize and allocate tasks into your daily schedule. It is more due to […]

Unleashing the power of stress, fear and risk to increase innovation - Biztorming · 10 June, 2019 at 4:13 pm

[…] agile we culture, where work is done in small, multidisciplinary and psychologically safe teams is best suited to innovation. Issues don’t necessarily go to managers to get solved, issues get solved immediately, when and […]

The role of the leader in agile organizations - Biztorming · 26 June, 2019 at 4:58 pm

[…] now is, what is the role of the leader in these agile organizations? Agile companies work in small teams that are multidisciplinary and autonomous, some don’t have leaders, some simply have facilitators to ensure successful interactions among […]

Why a clear purpose can become your competitive advantage - Biztorming · 6 July, 2019 at 3:34 pm

[…] same happens with teams and companies. As the research from McKInsey&Company Leading agile transformations “Purpose amounts to a […]

How agile communication improves team effectiveness - Biztorming Training · 2 October, 2019 at 8:50 am

[…] Agile organizations instead promote constant feedback, which allows changing behaviors before it’s too late. Communication between peers is promoted. Some companies do not have any formal performance evaluation, the leader provides feedback at the time it is necessary, there are no requirements. Other companies simply have informal conversations once a year with the entire work team to focus on strengths and opportunities for improvement. In Buurtzborg, (a nonprofit organization for nurses from the Netherlands with more than 7,000 employees) feedback is provided in groups of 3. Each team member prepares his own evaluation, plus the evaluation of his other two partners. They talk about each other’s evaluation and agree on strengths and improvement opportunities. The goal is to make the feedback more frequent, more diverse and less threatening so that behaviors can be modeled more effectively. […]

Sky High: How self-organizing teams and a ‘we’ culture set the stage for innovation - Biztorming Training · 2 March, 2020 at 9:26 am

[…] build the first self-organizing team that embraces the “we” culture, leadership must define the main rules of the road—that is, […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: